Wet Fractionation of Hard-to-Cook Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Seeds and Characterization of Protein, Starch and Fibre Fractions

Jorge C. Ruiz-Ruiz, Gloria Dávila-Ortíz, Luis A. Chel-Guerrero, David A. Betancur-Ancona

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

A 23 factorial design with four replicates of the central trial was used to evaluate wet-fractionation conditions for complete use of hard-to-cook (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) seeds. Tested variables were flour/water ratio (1:5, 1:7. 5 and 1:10 w/v), pH (8, 9. 5 and 11) and a soaking time (1, 2 and 3 h). The optimum conditions (1:10 w/v flour/water ratio; pH 8; and 1 h soaking time) were determined by the percentages of protein and starch recovery. Three fractions were obtained by the process: a protein isolate, starch fraction and fibrous residue. Isolate crude protein content was 73. 03%; its in vitro digestibility was 76. 7%, and its amino acids concentrations, except for methionine and cysteine, met essential amino acids requirements for preschool children and adults. Total starch content was 71. 41% with an amylose content of 21. 46% and an amylopectin content of 78. 54%. Total dietary fibre in the fibrous residue was 42. 12%, with 81. 10% insoluble fibre and 18. 91% soluble fibre. The protein isolate's high protein content, the purity of the starch fraction and high proportion of insoluble fibre in the fibrous residues show wet fractionated hard-to-cook bean to be a promising source of functional ingredients with possible food industry applications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1531-1540
Number of pages10
JournalFood and Bioprocess Technology
Volume5
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2012

Keywords

  • Fibrous residue
  • Hard-to-cook bean
  • Protein isolate
  • Starch
  • Wet fractionation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Wet Fractionation of Hard-to-Cook Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Seeds and Characterization of Protein, Starch and Fibre Fractions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this