Have there been changes in the application of mechanical ventilation in relation to scientific evidence? A multicenter observational study in Mexico

Título traducido de la contribución: ¿Se han producido cambios en la aplicación de la ventilación mecánica en relación con la evidencia científica? Estudio multicéntrico en México

Investigadores en el primer estudio (1998), Investigadores en el segundo estudio (2004), Investigadores en el tercer estudio (2010), Investigadores en el cuarto estudio (2016)

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

Resumen

Objective: The main study objectives were to describe the practice of mechanical ventilation over an 18-year period in Mexico, and estimate changes in mortality among critical patients subjected to invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Design: A retrospective subanalysis of a prospective observational study conducted in 1998, 2004, 2010 and 2016 was carried out. Setting: Intensive Care Units (ICUs) in Mexico. Participants: Adult patients consecutively enrolled in the ICU during one month and who underwent IMV for more than 12 hours or noninvasive mechanical ventilation for more than one hour. Follow-up was performed up to a maximum of 28 days after inclusion. Interventions: None. Principal variables of interest: Age, sex, severity upon admission as estimated by SAPS II, parameters of daily arterial blood gases, treatment and complication variables, date and status at discharge from the ICU and from hospital. Results: A total of 959 patients were included in 81 ICUs. Tidal volume (vt) decreased significantly both in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) criteria (estimated 8.5 ml/kg b.w. in 1998 to 6 ml/kg in 2016; P<0.001) and in patients without ARDS (estimated 9 ml/kg b.w. in 1998 to 6 ml/kg in 2016; P<0.001). The ventilatory protective strategy (defined as vt < 6 ml/kg or < 8 ml/kg and a plateau pressure < 30 cmH2O) was: 19% in 1998, 44% in 2004, 58% in 2010 and 75% in 2016 (P<0.001). The adjusted mortality rate in ICU over the 4 periods was: in 2004, odds ratio (OR) 1.05 (95% confidence interval, 95%CI: 0.73-1.72; P=0.764); in 2010, OR 1.68 (95%CI: 1.13-2.48; P=0.009); in 2016, OR 0.85 (95%CI: 0.60-1.20; P=0.368). Conclusions: The clinical practice of IMV in Mexican ICUs has been modified over a period of 18 years. The most significant change is the ventilatory strategy based on low vt. These changes have not been associated with significant changes in mortality.

Título traducido de la contribución¿Se han producido cambios en la aplicación de la ventilación mecánica en relación con la evidencia científica? Estudio multicéntrico en México
Idioma originalInglés
Páginas (desde-hasta)333-343
Número de páginas11
PublicaciónMedicina Intensiva
Volumen44
N.º6
DOI
EstadoPublicada - 1 ago. 2020

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de '¿Se han producido cambios en la aplicación de la ventilación mecánica en relación con la evidencia científica? Estudio multicéntrico en México'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto