Networks in modern rituals: An ethnographic method for quantitative semiotics

Berna Leticia Valle, Oswaldo Morales Matamoros

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is the introduction of a methodology for Quantitative Semiotics within a Systemic Approach and conjoined by the ethnohistorical method for studying one of Mexico’s most distinctive rituals: preparations of the cempaxuchitl flower (Tagetes erecta) for the Day of the Dead offerings as carried out by two families. The methodology consists of two steps: based in Soft Systems Methodology (Checkland, 2009), the first one is the definition of the problem-situation of study at a given moment and its goal focuses on the descriptions of the ethnographic methods used for data gathering and structuring, mainly, an economic history model by Braudel (1992) that addresses sociocultural changes an continuities. The second step involves the characterization of a communicative event through Quantitative Semiotics aided by adapted versions of Kinship Theory (Yanagisako & Collier 1996; Fortes 1949; Morgan 1871; Dziebel, 2006), Percolation Theory (Sahimi, 2009) and the tools provided by Graph and Network Theory. The results, though they remain only exploratory, allow for considerations of how the treatment of ethnographic data as the quantitative property in graph and network representations enabled the identification of meanings consolidating; chiefly the process by which a common object becomes a ritual object1.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationRituals
Subtitle of host publicationPast, Present and Future Perspectives
PublisherNova Science Publishers, Inc.
Pages41-62
Number of pages22
ISBN (Electronic)9781536104066
ISBN (Print)9781536103847
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2016

Keywords

  • Complex networks
  • Day of the dead
  • Percolation
  • Quantitative semiotics
  • Ritual

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Networks in modern rituals: An ethnographic method for quantitative semiotics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this