Mass treatment against human taeniasis for the control of cysticercosis: A population-based intervention study

E. Sarti, P. M. Schantz, G. Avila, J. Ambrosio, R. Medina-Santillán, A. Flisser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

126 Scopus citations

Abstract

An intervention study with mass treatment against taeniasis to prevent neurocysticercosis due to Taenia solium in a rural community in Mexico was performed in 1991-96. Information and biological samples were obtained at the beginning of the study, at 6 months and at 42 months after mass treatment with praziquantel at a single dose of 5 mg/kg. Prevalence rates of taeniasis were measured by the detection of Taenia coproantigens and Taenia eggs in faeces; neurocysticercosis was suggested by clinical data and by serum antibodies in humans and also in swine. A reduction of 53% after 6 months and of 56% after 42 months for human taeniasis was seen after treatment. Late-onset general seizures decreased 70%. Anti-cysticercus antibodies in the human population were reduced by 75% after 42 months. Antibodies in pigs also showed a significant reduction of 55% after 6 months. In conclusion, an impact of mass chemotherapy against taeniasis to control cysticercosis in the shea and long term was demonstrated. Praziquantel for tapeworm treatment should not be given at doses lower than 10 mg/kg. Late-onset convulsive crisis and specific antibodies are good indicators of neurocysticercosis and of exposure to the parasite, respectively.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)85-89
Number of pages5
JournalTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Volume94
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2000

Keywords

  • Anti-cysticercus antibodies
  • Cysticercosis
  • Disease control
  • Mass treatment
  • Mexico
  • Praziquantel
  • Swine cysticercosis
  • Taenia solium
  • Taeniasis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mass treatment against human taeniasis for the control of cysticercosis: A population-based intervention study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this