Marine extinctions revisited

Pablo Del Monte-Luna, Daniel Lluch-Belda, Elisa Serviere-Zaragoza, Roberto Carmona, Héctor Reyes-Bonilla, David Aurioles-Gamboa, José Luis Castro-Aguirre, Sergio A.Guzmán Del Próo, Oscar Trujillo-Millán, Barry W. Brook

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

45 Scopus citations

Abstract

In recent years, more than 130 extinctions have been estimated to have occurred in the marine realm. Here we review this body of evidence and show that this figure may actually be overestimated by as much as 50%. We argue that previous estimates have not fully taken into account critical uncertainties such as naturally variable geographical distributions, and have misinterpreted documentary evidence. However, current evidence indicates that some sharks, rays and reef-associated species, although not necessarily geographically restricted, are particularly vulnerable to anthropogenic impacts and now occur in very low numbers. Overestimating extinctions is of concern because it could reduce confidence in the credibility of the 'extinct' category in threatened species lists and, ultimately, be used to question the integrity of conservation and management policies. We suggest that when integrating future checklists of marine extinct species, there needs to be a more rigorous use of the terminology of extinction, and participation by specialists in each of the particular taxonomic groups involved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)107-122
Number of pages16
JournalFish and Fisheries
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2007
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Biodiversity loss
  • Extirpation
  • Global change
  • Habitat loss
  • Overexploitation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Marine extinctions revisited'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this