In vitro methods for comparing target binding and CDC induction between therapeutic antibodies: Applications in biosimilarity analysis

Nohemi Salinas-Jazmín, Edith González-González, Luz X. Vásquez-Bochm, Sonia M. Pérez-Tapia, Marco A. Velasco-Velázquez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are relevant to the treatment of different pathologies, including cancers. The development of biosimilar mAbs by pharmaceutical companies is a market opportunity, but it is also a strategy to increase drug accessibility and reduce therapyassociated costs. The protocols detailed here describe the evaluation of target binding and CDC induction by rituximab in Daudi cells. These two functions require different structural regions of the antibody and are relevant to the clinical effect induced by rituximab. The protocols allow the side-to-side comparison of a reference rituximab and a marketed rituximab biosimilar. The evaluated products showed differences both in target binding and CDC induction, suggesting that there are underlying physicochemical differences and highlighting the need to analyze the impact of those differences in the clinical setting. The methods reported here constitute simple and inexpensive in vitro models for the evaluation of the activity of rituximab biosimilars. Thus, they can be useful during biosimilar development, as well as for quality control in biosimilar production. Furthermore, the presented methods can be extrapolated to other therapeutic mAbs.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere55542
JournalJournal of Visualized Experiments
Volume2017
Issue number123
DOIs
StatePublished - 4 May 2017

Keywords

  • Anti-CD20
  • Biosimilar
  • CDC
  • Daudi cells
  • Flow cytometry
  • Immunology
  • Issue 123
  • Rituximab
  • Therapeutic mAb

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'In vitro methods for comparing target binding and CDC induction between therapeutic antibodies: Applications in biosimilarity analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this