TY - JOUR
T1 - Erratum to
T2 - Multilingual Sentiment Analysis: State of the Art and Independent Comparison of Techniques (Cogn Comput, 10.1007/s12559-016-9415-7)
AU - Dashtipour, Kia
AU - Poria, Soujanya
AU - Hussain, Amir
AU - Cambria, Erik
AU - Hawalah, Ahmad Y.A.
AU - Gelbukh, Alexander
AU - Zhou, Qiang
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
PY - 2016/8/1
Y1 - 2016/8/1
N2 - With the advent of the internet, people actively express their opinions about products, services, events, political parties, etc., in social media, blogs, and website comments. The amount of research work on sentiment analysis is growing explosively. However, the majority of research efforts are devoted to English language data, while a great share of information is available in other languages. We present a state-of-the-art review on multilingual sentiment analysis. More importantly, we compare our own implementation of existing state-of-the-art approaches on common data. Precision observed in our experiments is typically lower than that reported by the original authors, which we attribute to lack of detail in the original presentation of those approaches. Thus, we compare the existing works by what they really offer to the reader, including whether they allow for accurate implementation and for reliable reproduction of the reported results.
AB - With the advent of the internet, people actively express their opinions about products, services, events, political parties, etc., in social media, blogs, and website comments. The amount of research work on sentiment analysis is growing explosively. However, the majority of research efforts are devoted to English language data, while a great share of information is available in other languages. We present a state-of-the-art review on multilingual sentiment analysis. More importantly, we compare our own implementation of existing state-of-the-art approaches on common data. Precision observed in our experiments is typically lower than that reported by the original authors, which we attribute to lack of detail in the original presentation of those approaches. Thus, we compare the existing works by what they really offer to the reader, including whether they allow for accurate implementation and for reliable reproduction of the reported results.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979986899&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12559-016-9421-9
DO - 10.1007/s12559-016-9421-9
M3 - Comentario/Debate
AN - SCOPUS:84979986899
SN - 1866-9956
VL - 8
SP - 772
EP - 775
JO - Cognitive Computation
JF - Cognitive Computation
IS - 4
ER -