A generalized fault classification for gas turbine diagnostics on steady states and transients

Igor Loboda, Sergey Yepifanov, Yakov Feldshteyn

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Gas turbine diagnostic techniques are often based on the recognition methods using the deviations between actual and expected thermodynamic performances. The problem is that the deviations depend on real operating conditions. However, our studies show that such a dependency can be reduced. In this paper, we propose the generalized fault classification that is independent of the operating conditions. To prove this idea, the averaged probabilities of the correct diagnosis are computed and compared for two cases: the proposed classification and the traditional one based on the fixed operating conditions. The probabilities are calculated through a stochastic modeling of the diagnostic process, in which a thermodynamic model generates deviations that are induced by the faults. Artificial neural networks recognize these faults. The proposed classification principle has been realized for both, steady state and transient operation of the gas turbine units. The results show that the acceptance of the generalized classification practically does not reduce the diagnosis trustworthiness.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2006 - Power for Land, Sea, and Air
Pages725-734
Number of pages10
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006
Event2006 ASME 51st Turbo Expo - Barcelona, Spain
Duration: 6 May 200611 May 2006

Publication series

NameProceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo
Volume2

Conference

Conference2006 ASME 51st Turbo Expo
Country/TerritorySpain
CityBarcelona
Period6/05/0611/05/06

Keywords

  • Diagnosis trustworthiness indices
  • Fault classification
  • Gas turbine diagnostics
  • Neural networks
  • Thermodynamic model

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A generalized fault classification for gas turbine diagnostics on steady states and transients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this