TY - JOUR
T1 - Failure pressure estimations for pipes with combined corrosion defects on the external surface
T2 - A comparative study
AU - Terán, G.
AU - Capula-Colindres, S.
AU - Velázquez, J. C.
AU - Fernández-Cueto, M. J.
AU - Angeles-Herrera, D.
AU - Herrera-Hernández, Héctor
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Authors.
PY - 2017/11/1
Y1 - 2017/11/1
N2 - In this research paper, the failure pressure predictions were obtained for a pipeline section by analyzing a combined corrosion defects, which joins together a general corrosion and a pitting corrosion defects. Well-known conventional mathematical methods were used in this study to predict the failure pressure of corroded steel pipelines, such as: B31G, RSTRENG-1, Shell-92, DNV, PCORR, and Fitnet FFS. The equations reported for corrosion defects with more complex characteristics developed by Choi et al., and Cronin et al. were also used. Furthermore, Finite Element (FEM) is one of the most employed nonlinear methods because of its good response of pipeline failure prediction under the corrosion mechanism. So, FEM methodology results the least conservative in comparison with the others mathematical models, according to the literature, for this reason it was used to compare the standard deviation σ of the methods. Failure pressure predictions determined that the most conservative methods were: Shell-92, Fitnet FFS, Choi's method, B31G, RSTRENG-1, Cronin's method, PCORR and DNV, in that order.
AB - In this research paper, the failure pressure predictions were obtained for a pipeline section by analyzing a combined corrosion defects, which joins together a general corrosion and a pitting corrosion defects. Well-known conventional mathematical methods were used in this study to predict the failure pressure of corroded steel pipelines, such as: B31G, RSTRENG-1, Shell-92, DNV, PCORR, and Fitnet FFS. The equations reported for corrosion defects with more complex characteristics developed by Choi et al., and Cronin et al. were also used. Furthermore, Finite Element (FEM) is one of the most employed nonlinear methods because of its good response of pipeline failure prediction under the corrosion mechanism. So, FEM methodology results the least conservative in comparison with the others mathematical models, according to the literature, for this reason it was used to compare the standard deviation σ of the methods. Failure pressure predictions determined that the most conservative methods were: Shell-92, Fitnet FFS, Choi's method, B31G, RSTRENG-1, Cronin's method, PCORR and DNV, in that order.
KW - Corrosion defect
KW - Failure pressure and finite element method
KW - Pipeline steels
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033715776&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.20964/2017.11.86
DO - 10.20964/2017.11.86
M3 - Artículo
SN - 1452-3981
VL - 12
SP - 10152
EP - 10176
JO - International Journal of Electrochemical Science
JF - International Journal of Electrochemical Science
IS - 11
ER -