Trinickia dabaoshanensis sp. nov., a new name for a lost species

Paulina Estrada-de los Santos; Marike Palmer; Emma T. Steenkamp; Marta Maluk; Chrizelle Beukes; Ann M. Hirsch; Euan K. James; Stephanus N. Venter

doi:10.1007/s00203-019-01703-2

Trinickia dabaoshanensis sp. nov., a new name for a lost species

Paulina Estrada-de los Santos, Marike Palmer, Emma T. Steenkamp, Marta Maluk, Chrizelle Beukes, Ann M. Hirsch, Euan K. James, Stephanus N. Venter

Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas (ENCB)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

“Burkholderia dabaoshanensis” was described in 2012. Although the name was effectively published, it could not be validly published, because the description provided in the original paper did not comply with the Rule 27 (2) (c) of the Bacterial Code. The Code requiresthat the properties of the taxon form part of the protologue. As the name of this species does not have standing in nomenclature, the recently published new combination Trinickia dabaoshanensis could also not be validly published. The current proposal attempts to rectify the situation by providing the information required to meet the criteria stipulated in Rule 27 for valid publication.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1313-1316
Number of pages	4
Journal	Archives of Microbiology
Volume	201
Issue number	9
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-019-01703-2
State	Published - 1 Nov 2019

Keywords

Burkholderia
Caballeronia
Mycetohabitans
Paraburkholderia
Robbsia
Trinickia

Access to Document

10.1007/s00203-019-01703-2

Cite this

@article{03ac1bd7cce344ab81ca5e86352db1d0,

title = " Trinickia dabaoshanensis sp. nov., a new name for a lost species",

abstract = "“Burkholderia dabaoshanensis” was described in 2012. Although the name was effectively published, it could not be validly published, because the description provided in the original paper did not comply with the Rule 27 (2) (c) of the Bacterial Code. The Code requiresthat the properties of the taxon form part of the protologue. As the name of this species does not have standing in nomenclature, the recently published new combination Trinickia dabaoshanensis could also not be validly published. The current proposal attempts to rectify the situation by providing the information required to meet the criteria stipulated in Rule 27 for valid publication.",

keywords = "Burkholderia, Caballeronia, Mycetohabitans, Paraburkholderia, Robbsia, Trinickia",

author = "{Estrada-de los Santos}, Paulina and Marike Palmer and Steenkamp, {Emma T.} and Marta Maluk and Chrizelle Beukes and Hirsch, {Ann M.} and James, {Euan K.} and Venter, {Stephanus N.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.",

year = "2019",

month = nov,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/s00203-019-01703-2",

language = "Ingl{\'e}s",

volume = "201",

pages = "1313--1316",

journal = "Archives of Microbiology",

issn = "0302-8933",

number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Trinickia dabaoshanensis sp. nov., a new name for a lost species

AU - Estrada-de los Santos, Paulina

AU - Palmer, Marike

AU - Steenkamp, Emma T.

AU - Maluk, Marta

AU - Beukes, Chrizelle

AU - Hirsch, Ann M.

AU - James, Euan K.

AU - Venter, Stephanus N.

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - “Burkholderia dabaoshanensis” was described in 2012. Although the name was effectively published, it could not be validly published, because the description provided in the original paper did not comply with the Rule 27 (2) (c) of the Bacterial Code. The Code requiresthat the properties of the taxon form part of the protologue. As the name of this species does not have standing in nomenclature, the recently published new combination Trinickia dabaoshanensis could also not be validly published. The current proposal attempts to rectify the situation by providing the information required to meet the criteria stipulated in Rule 27 for valid publication.

AB - “Burkholderia dabaoshanensis” was described in 2012. Although the name was effectively published, it could not be validly published, because the description provided in the original paper did not comply with the Rule 27 (2) (c) of the Bacterial Code. The Code requiresthat the properties of the taxon form part of the protologue. As the name of this species does not have standing in nomenclature, the recently published new combination Trinickia dabaoshanensis could also not be validly published. The current proposal attempts to rectify the situation by providing the information required to meet the criteria stipulated in Rule 27 for valid publication.

KW - Burkholderia

KW - Caballeronia

KW - Mycetohabitans

KW - Paraburkholderia

KW - Robbsia

KW - Trinickia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068902286&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00203-019-01703-2

DO - 10.1007/s00203-019-01703-2

M3 - Artículo

C2 - 31297578

AN - SCOPUS:85068902286

SN - 0302-8933

VL - 201

SP - 1313

EP - 1316

JO - Archives of Microbiology

JF - Archives of Microbiology

IS - 9

ER -

Trinickia dabaoshanensis sp. nov., a new name for a lost species

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this